Six Wishes for Biden’s First 100 Days

As a pragmatist, despite profound relief after Joe Biden’s win, I don’t imagine four short years of rational leadership will undo all the environmental damage inflicted by the Trump administration. But here’s my wish list for Biden’s first 100 days.

 

Goal one: Rejoin the Paris Climate Accord. Biden has vowed to rejoin the Paris Agreement on Day 1 of his presidency. Apparently, this only requires a letter to the UN to take effect and would recast the U.S. to, once again, take a leading role in reducing atmospheric CO2 levels. Unfortunately, there’s no making up for lost time.  At 417.16 ppm in May of this year, up from an annual peak of 407.70 in May of 2016, the CO2 genie is out of the bottle.

 

Goal two: Work some bipartisanship magic and move a COVID-19 relief package through the House and Senate with green energy funding for states and local governments.  This legislation should stimulate green infrastructure research and development and fund job training, especially in regions hardest hit economically by COVID-19 like Alaska, where 37,600 individuals lost their jobs as the hospitality and fossil fuel industries took a hit. This funding could employ local contractors in weatherizing state and municipal buildings, installing solar panels, wind turbines, and heat pumps, and setting up recharge stations in and between Alaska’s cities for electric vehicles.

 

Biden’s “Build Back Better” economic plan includes a 2-trillion-dollar budget over the next four years to address fossil fuel emissions and ramp up a conversion to clean energy while addressing America’s aging infrastructure. In the process he plans to create millions of new jobs in the automobile, transportation, power, and housing sectors. If he succeeds, the plan will move our nation closer to Biden’s goal of 100 percent clean energy by 2050. How would he pay for this, you ask? By repealing Trump’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 for the country’s wealthiest ten-percent, projected to drain 1.9-trillion-dollars from the treasury over a ten-year period.

 

While he’s at it, Biden could extend the soon-to-expire Investment Tax Credit for the new installation of residential and commercial solar energy systems.

 

Goal three: Use emergency authority to rewrite drilling and land management plans which redirect BLM staff away from leasing and permitting new oil and gas leases on federal lands, like the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. This isn’t an all-out ban, but would avoid lengthy and contentious congressional and legal battles. He could, apparently, sign an outright ban on offshore drilling in federal waters, which accounts for about 16% of total oil production.

 

Goal four: Use his executive powers (newly expanded under the Trump administration) to put the teeth back into the NEPA process by bringing back independent (rather than industry-based) environmental analysis, requiring assessment and consideration of cumulative effects (like climate change and water resources), and an easier process for meaningful public input. Better yet, protect the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, sensitive areas in the National Petroleum Reserve, like Teshekpuk Lake (critical to vast flocks of migrating waterfowl,) and cultural resources like Bear’s Ears National Monument, through legislation that safeguards them from oil and gas exploration and extraction in perpetuity.

 

Goal five: Reverse Trump’s recent order to lift the roadless rule in Alaska’s Tonga’s National Forest, opening up 9.4 million acres to road building and logging. Instead of building a maze of new roads to cut old-growth stands of red and yellow cedar, Sitka spruce and hemlock, work with Native Alaskans and the USFS in a compromise to identify low-impact regions within roaded areas where selective cutting would not result in mudslides and damage to salmon streams and could be done without an offset of millions of taxpayer dollars to cover the cost of road construction.

 

Goal six: Weigh in on new national Arctic strategies with the Arctic Council with a focus on sustainable economic development and strengthen international collaboration.

 

Over the past four years, while Trump disregarded and disemboweled climate science in the US, the scientific world has moved on without us. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the far north. As temperatures in the Arctic and subarctic continue to increase at twice the global rate, whole ecosystems are shifting, impacting wildlife, indigenous peoples, and opening up new economic opportunities hand-in-glove with potential hazards. The United States should be at the table, or on the ice, alongside our international colleagues.

 

Let me close by saying, when I feel discouraged by the assault we’ve suffered over the past four years, like a hundred razor-sharp cuts to our environment and our democracy, I remind myself of the nation-wide March for Science, the global Student Strike for Climate, and the vast swell of support (FINALLY) for addressing climate change as a key issue in the 2020 Democratic race, and I find courage. We’re in for a fight, but we’re woke, and we’re ready.

 

 

 

Out with the Old, In with the New

In an attempt to keep up with the times and create an opportunity for other folks to contribute their ideas and insights on and about Alaska, this will be our last issue of the Water Policy Consulting Newsletter. Instead, staring the first of January, we will shift our energies to a new blog under the name of Boreal Observer. This will allow us to expand our audience and speak out more directly about issues facing Alaska. As always, our focus will include the evolving climate crisis, timber and mining issues, water rights, and litigation. Additionally, we will add a focus on community and environmental resilience and appreciation of this, our last great wilderness.  You can find us at https://borealobserver.com

 

If you, or someone you know, is interested in sharing essays or photos about their observations and experiences in Alaska, please contact us for more information about submissions.

 

 

Trump Makes Haste to Lay Waste to the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge

In an effort to hold oil and gas lease sales in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge before President Trump leaves office on January 20th, the Bureau of Land Management has issued a call for nominations. The timing is tight. A 30-day call for submissions will end December 17th followed by a 30-day notice prior to final lease sales. With 1.6 million acres of caribou and polar bear habitat at stake, conservative groups around the country, along with the Gwich’in Steering Committee, are suing the Trump administration over violations to the Endangered Species Act, a flawed environmental impact statement, and the foreshortened two-week public comment period (which ended on November 6th) following the initial announcement of the plan.

 

Despite the last-minute opportunity for lease sales, bidders may be hesitant, given President-Elect Joe Biden’s victory. Biden is adamantly opposed to opening the refuge and has vowed to use the powers at his disposal, be it a congressional bill or an executive decision, to thwart oil and gas lease sales on the Arctic Plane. Couple that with a growing list of major banks unwilling to lend capitol to developers eyeing the Refuge, ferocious legal opposition from numerous environmental and Native challengers, and continued low oil prices, there’s good reason to hope that Big Oil will leave well enough alone.

 

ConocoPhillips Receives Final Approval for New Arctic Field

The Bureau of Land Management gave their Record of Decision go-ahead for the Willow Master Development Plan, paving the way for ConocoPhillips to tap the projected 590-million-barrel reserve on the eastern edge of the National Petroleum Reserve. While Alaskan delegates may cheer the news, environmental groups see it as yet another failure of the State and Federal governments to scale down oil production in favor of carbon-neutral technology. Read more.

Lawsuit Seeks to Halt Ambler Road Project

Once again, the Trump administration is embroiled in a lawsuit, this time with Tanana Chiefs Conference, over a “rushed, flawed, premature, and inadequate” environmental impact statement related to the proposed Ambler Road Project.  The Tanana Chiefs Conference, plus a number of other independent Athabascan and Inupiat villages, have filed suit to halt the 211-mile industrial road.  The road will open up access through the foothills of the Brooks Range to copper deposits on Bureau of Land Management lands. According to the lawsuit, “Mining operations are anticipated to sprawl out in every direction from the road corridor passing directly through and between several National Parks, National Wildlife Refuges, and other conservation system units, thus piercing the heart of one of the most spectacular and sensitive regions of Interior Alaska.”

The GOP’s slide towards Authoritarianism Under Trump

Despite the legitimate elections results, that the Trump administration, so far, has no intention of leaving the Whitehouse in January, is best illustrated by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s response that “[t]here will be a smooth transition to a second Trump administration” when recently asked by reporters about the transition of power to president elect Joe Biden. So while the Trump administration holds the country hostage during a pandemic that it has done little to control, it’s no wonder CNN’s Anderson Cooper vented his frustration by stating: “That is the president of the United States. That is the most powerful person in the world. We see him like an obese turtle on his back flailing in the hot sun, realizing his time is over.”

In her book “Fascism – A Warning” former Secretary of State, Madeleine Albright is more direct: “If we think of Fascism as wound from the past that had almost healed, putting Trump in the White House was like ripping off the bandage and picking at the scab.” Albright says that “we have not had a chief executive in the modern era whose statements and actions are so at odds with democratic ideals.”

The real concern for the future of democracy in the United States, however, is not Trump’s latest attention grabbing temper tantrum, but the fact that the GOP is not the same party it was before he took office. In fact, Senate Republican’s continued support for Trump’s current bullying behavior, signifies the party’s gradual move away from democratic principals that started long before the 2016 election.

In the summer of 2005, for example, President George W. Bush found that he had two opportunities to replace the U.S. Supreme Court Justices William Rehnquist and Sandra Day O’Conner with conservative idealogues, the New York times warned that we should “[i]magine a country in which Social Security, job safety laws and environmental protections were unconstitutional. Imagine judges longing for that. Imagine one of them as the next Supreme Court nominee [and then] imagine the American public is powerless to stop them.”

Ever since 2005, in addition to continuing to stack the courts, the republican party has been steadily moving further to the right and slowly consolidating power as it moves towards autocracy. In fact, the extent to which the party no longer adheres to democratic ideals and morals is so dramatic that just before the Nov. 3 election, an international team of political scientists was able to quantify it. The V-Dem Institute interviewed over 600 political experts from around the world who made assessments of political parties from different countries adherence to key democratic values and developed a report that illustrates the GOP’s continued it’s decline during the Obama administration with the rise of the tea party whose members accused president Obama of being both a socialist and a Nazi at the same time and suggested that he was subverting the Constitution and then dropped substantially in 2016 after Trump won the presidential election.

According to the V-Dem Institute scientists, GOP’s hedging toward authoritarianism has only become more apparent in the days following the 2020 election. Anna Lührmann political scientist with Sweden’s University of Gothenburg says “It is disturbing that most leading Republicans are still not objecting to President Trump’s baseless claims of electoral fraud and attempts to declare himself the winner.”

If there’s one thing republican leadership learned from Trump, it’s that, as long as you’re the party in power, you can get away with just about anything. As a result, the not only did the republican party’s hunger for more power sky-rocket under Trump, but both Republican and Democratic rejection of the use of violence against political opponents changed starting with the 2016 campaign. At that time, Trump encouraged violence against opposition protesters and then as President, praised Montana Republican congressional candidate Greg Gianforte who was convicted of assault for body slamming a reporter and defended right-wing violence in relation to Black Lives Matters protesters.

That Trump’s violent rhetoric during the 2016 election, inspired even elected officials is illustrated by right-wing Kentucky Governor, Matt Bevin’s statement that violence against political opponents may be necessary if Hillary Clinton won. Then in September 2020, Facebook removed a post by Georgia republican congressional, candidate  Marjorie Taylor Greene for violating a policy against inciting violence. Regardless, Taylor Greene, who ran largely un-opposed, won and is now serving as Georgia’s representatives in the House.

The transformation of the GOP under Trump therefore, is the realization that as long as they are the party in power, they can get away with just about anything. If democrats, therefore, fail to take the senate in the last election and the main focus of Senate Republicans will be to disrupt Biden’s agenda, so that they can re-claim the presidency in 2024.

As stated by Christopher Ingraham of the Washington Post the “V-Dem’s data underscores how much of Many of the GOP leaders going along with Trump’s baseless claims of voter fraud will still be in office after he leaves.” Unless the Senate turns once all the ballots are counted, therefore, it best it will be difficult, for example, for Biden to obtain confirmation of cabinet, federal court and other nominees which must be approved by the increasingly authoritarian leaning senate. Similarly, with loss of seats in the House, Democrats lead will be slimmer there and many more will be reluctant to stick their necks out for democracy resulting in less decisive decisions on many issues. At worst, if the senate repulicans are not held accountable for embracing authoritarianism, the future of democracy is in jeopardy.

From GOP Power Grab to Trump Super Spreader

The recent passing of Supreme Court justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg, has given the GOP  the opportunity to make another  power grab, this time, in the form of rush to make a life-time appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court before the 2020 presidential election.  Within days of Ginsberg’s death, Trump announced that he had already begun the search for a replacement and that the replacement would take place within the next 7 weeks before the election.

This is contrary to Senates practice over the past 40 years which has consistently taken almost 3 months to appoint Supreme Court justices including selection by the President, vetting by the Senate Judiciary Committee and then a final vote on the Senate floor. Now that the republican controlled senate eliminated the filibuster in 2017, the party that controls the senate could go through the entire process without a single vote from the minority party.

Based on this process and arguing that appointments to the Supreme Court should not take place in an election year, when Justice Anthony Scalia died in 2016, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky, refused to hold a confirmation vote for President Obama’s nominee – Merrick Garland. Similarly, during a Senate Judiciary Committee meeting in opposition to Garland’s appointment, Committee chair, Lindsey Graham, R-South Carolina, was even more emphatic “use my words against me. If there’s a Republican president (elected) in 2016 and a vacancy occurs in the last year of the first term, you can say Lindsey Graham said, ‘Let’s let the next president, whoever it might be, make that nomination.’”

Within hours of Ginsberg’s death, however, Senate republicans seem to have lost their compassion for letting the democratic process run it’s course, when McConnell called for a floor foot on and Graham said he would support anyone President Trump nominated. Even Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski who, after Trump announced the move to rush the nominee through the Senate, and recalling the GOP commitment in 2016,  said she “would not support taking up a potential Supreme Court vacancy this close to the election,” began back tracking just days after making this pronouncement. She now says she could vote in favor of the Trump’s nominee if process is not being rushed to meet “a deadline that is hard and fast.”

However, the Senate Republic and Trump’s latest judicial power grab and an unanticipated backlash after Trump announced  Amy Coney Barrett a U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit judge and former clerk for Justice Antonin Scalia as his pick to replace Ginsberg, when held his now infamous COVID-19 super spreader meet and great for the new nominee. As a result several of the senators present at the event have since tested positive for the disease and are now attending Judge Barrett’s confirmation hearings which began on Monday October 12. Sen. Graham who was also present at the meet and greet for Judge Barrett has refused to be tested for COVID.

The ill-regard for the health of others and the rushed proceedings has caused consternation among democrats.  Sen. Elizabeth Warren said that this “sham hearing  on a holiday, 22 days from Election Day, during a COVID-19 outbreak in the Judiciary Committee with a likely-exposed Chairman who won’t get tested  shows just how far the GOP will go to steal another Supreme Court seat & hand our courts over to extremists…”

As if to confirm the lopsided and calamitous process, instead of  the usual manner for announcing a Supreme Court Justice confirmation hearing, in which the chairman states that the hearing is for the purpose of “considering the nomination,” instead, Graham pronounced that this is “the hearing to confirm Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court…”

Because the vote in the Senate to confirm Judge Barrett could be close, every vote will count. Contact Senator Murkowski and tell her that rush to place another conservative idealogue on the Supreme Court threatens the basis of democracy the country was founded on and that she should  stick to her original commitment to wait until after the election to fill the position.

New Global Database Spotlights Freshwater Fish and Climate Change

Research findings on inland fish and impacts from climate change are now available in an updatable, searchable database, thanks to a team effort by the National CASC, USGS, and University partners. FiCli (the Fish and Climate Change Database) contains a breadth of peer-reviewed literature spanning geographic regions on a global scale. The data, which will continue to grow as more data are added, will help inform resource managers and spur future studies on fish health and climate.

A Green Recovery from the Pandemic?

House Democrats are writing a $1.5 trillion infrastructure bill that would fund everything from education to rural broadband to clean water, with an eye toward charting the path toward a green recovery from the pandemic. POLITICO’s Kathryn A. Wolfe reports that Democrats appear to be building from the $494 billion transportation bill making its way through the chamber and hope to have a full package passed before the July 4 recess. It also will include $70 billion for “clean energy,” $25 billion for drinking water programs, $35 billion for health care infrastructure and $100 billion for broadband, House Energy and Commerce Chair Frank Pallone (D-N.J.) told reporters. The legislation is also expected to contain $1 billion for climate resiliency upgrades to public housing, among other programs in that area.

The bill is likely to encounter resistance from the President Donald Trump and Senate Republicans, as past Democratic proposals have. But Speaker Nancy Pelosi projected optimism at a press conference Thursday. “When people see the legislation, and people see how it does affect their areas — this is not just a matter of transportation, it’s a matter of clean air, clean water,” Pelosi said. “So, we think that this will be nonpartisan, very bipartisan, and we look forward to working together — House and Senate, Democrats and Republicans, and the White House.”

The Trump administration continues its push for offshore Arctic oil development

Secretary of the Interior David Bernhardt and Secretary of Commerce Wilbur RossIn U.S. District Court in Anchorage recently, filed notice that they are appealing the March 29 ruling that threw out Trump’s executive action reopening closed Arctic and Atlantic waters to oil leasing.

In that ruling, U.S. District Court Judge Sharon Gleason said Trump violated the law with a 2017 executive order that reversed President Obama’s actions withdrawing most U.S. Arctic waters and portions of the Atlantic Ocean from the federal offshore oil and gas leasing program. Presidents have the right under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to withdraw areas from leasing, but adding areas to the leasing program requires Congressional action, Gleason said in her ruling.

The ruling erected a new hurdle to a planned 2019 Beaufort Sea lease sale and threw the Trump administration’s entire five-year leasing plan into question